For context on the debunk, I debated Ace, the original creator of Tablet Feat (TF), on its validity. When the verdict was issued, the judge deemed that I won all of the following points. I wrote this doc to clarify all of the debunks I made in order to comprehensively summarize the takeaways from Tablet Feat’s validity and its current evaluation in SCD. The debate took place in PX district’s “tablet feat validity” channel and it goes much more in-depth, so I recommend exploring it if you’re interested (and GGs to Ace on the debate). Starts at pinned message.
- The semantics and context dictate that takuya specifically HELD the tablet throughout the dialogue he had with d tsubaki, in which he had complete visual access to the tablet until tsubaki specifically made him step back (the original timeframe is believed to be 0.5 seconds, but through this correction, the new timeframe can be interpreted as ~15 seconds which massively nerfs the psi.) Essentially, Takuya had 30x more time to execute his calculations.
- Complete 3D visualization is not necessitated. Rather, only consideration of the ramifications of the 3rd dimension is required for TF. So, general terrain features and its effect on travel were accounted for, but not actively visualized. (vastly decreases the vsi correlation of the feat during Takuya’s calculations).
- The basis of visualization is completely restricted to a 50 square inch map and should not be treated as a visualization of a 35 square km island, inherently limiting the cpi/vsi of the feat by a significant margin.
- Differential calculus cannot consistently measure the meter-perfect line up of Riku and Kito due to a vast array of random occurrences that may fluctuate the calculation. Instead, there were multiple dozen meters of leeway for their confrontation to be premeditated, as opposed to the flawed precise meter claim in TF. This is due to the fact that Kito and Riku’s conflict would be initiated upon seeing each other (albeit in an area with poor visibility, which is why the margin of error is only some tens of meters). This massively nerfs the vsi/cpi required yet again. The actual difficulty of the equation that takuya executed would therefore be overstated as well.
These nerfs affect TF exponentially, reducing its potency by many hundred times.
As of now, the cpi/vsi correlation of it is mediocre at best, and barely touches the higher end of the human norm. However, there are still impressive aspects about TF that aren’t affected too heavily by the debunks. For example, the logical reasoning aspect is still decent by all means.
How would Takuya compare to others in FSIQ after this debunk? Here are some comparisons for you to better understand his current placement.
The following characters now take FSIQ vs Takuya: Light, Yokoya, Arisu, Koenji, Mello, Nagumo, Kirigiri, and those of a similar tier.
*Takuya’s VSI feat in Y2V7, although weak, now beats current TF. As for CPI, a few arguments can be made, but scaling Takuya to FMA is an invalid approach that’s exclusively plausible by narrative scaling.
Lastly, as a disclaimer: I don’t want this debunk to be treated as any form of an attack to anyone. My intent was solely for TF to be evaluated fairly, and I have no ill intent or anything of the like towards the creator of this doc.
If you would like to discuss details about TF, then add my discord account at:
tertywater